E
Edwin Pawlowski
hyundaitech said:You could go to small claims or other court, but winning won't
be a certainty.
And if you win, you may not be able to tell anyone about it

hyundaitech said:You could go to small claims or other court, but winning won't
be a certainty.
Disgruntled said:I suggest you read Michael's original post - you know, the one that asked for
feedback because he believed that Hyundai was acting in a deceptive manner.
That's what newsgroups are all about - responding to requests for information;
you would be wise to think about that before trying to stifle a reply to
someone else's request for feedback.
And on't worry, I am moving on, bloke. That'll keep this group more
homogenous, so you won't have to read comments you don't like and therefore
judge as untrustworthy. G'day.
Disgruntled said:I understand your position and appreciate that you at least acknowledged that I
may have provided useful information in response to a request for information.
What you may want to consider is that informing the requester about the
nondisclose agreement also conveyed potentially useful information. What you
also may want to consider is that the nondisclosure language was not
boilerplate language and did not prevent my communication here. Providing
copies of the pleadings would have violated the terms of nondisclosure. In any
event, it's too bad the responders (but perhaps significantly not the original
requester) are much too quick to jump to conclusions and insult rather than
encourage discussion.
Michael said:Thanks Darby, and for all the other posts.
It just pisses me off that the clutch went out at 47K - I think it should
have lasted longer, especially since it's not driven hard. Further, the
flywheel has to be replaced - $1050 just for the part and no after market
available. My personal opinion of Hyundai has really diminished to the point
where I won't ever buy another one. Their warranty doesn't count for much of
anything.
hyundaitech said:Unlike most clutches, the damper in this system is in the flywheel rather
than the clutch disc. Not only can the flywheel not be resurfaced, it's
also very expensive.
Matt Whiting said:I agree that a clutch should last much longer than that under normal
conditions, but Hyundai has no idea as to whether your car was driven
"normally" or hard. The same problem exists with brake linings. I often
get 60,000 miles out of disk pads, yet I know many people lucky to get
12,000 and you need only one ride with them to know why.
The problem with wear items like this is that their life is necessity VERY
dependent on driver technique and the car maker has no control over that.
I'm concerned that my Sonata clutch is not going to have a long life as it
is a VERY hard car to drive such as to be easy on the clutch. The clutch
is too light with little feedback during engagement and the throttle is
like a switch. This makes if very hard to start out with anything less
than 1500 or so RPM. With my Chevy truck, I can modulate the throttle and
clutch such that I can start out smartly yet smoothly and never exceed
1,000 RPM before the clutch is fully engaged. Doing this with my Sonata
is nearly impossible and can be done only with intense concentration and
with a very slow start - not very conducive to driving in heavy traffic
with a line of cars behind you waiting for you to get going.
Matt
\hyundaitech said:Since I'm not that great at describing things, I did some googling on "dual
mass flywheel," and here's one of the better links I've found. It's the
LuK website.
http://www.luk.com/content.luk.de/en/products/clutch_systems_new/zms_new/zms_new.jsp
I do wish, however, everyone would stop using the verb "dampen" and the
noun "dampener" to indicate the verb "damp" and the noun "damper." Am I
alone in this?
Michael said:Matt,
I understand your point regarding items that wear and Hyundai having no idea
whether the item was abused or not. That doesn't work for me though. It is
too subjective, therefore there must be objective criteria for the service
person to use in order to judge whether abuse or misuse ocurred.
hyundaitech said:Matt wrote:
"What do you mean by this? Do you mean that the spring center is in the
flywheel rather than the clutch disk? By this I mean the springs that are
oriented circumferentially and allow the disk to rotate slightly in
relation to the splines so as to absorb rotational shocks."
Pretty much. I've never actually tried to take one of these flywheels
apart to see what the dampers look like, so I'm not sure that the
mechanism looks like it does on the clutch disc. In this system, the
clutch disc is solid-- the fibers are attached to the disc, which is part
now essentially part of the hub, rather than being attached via the
dampers (the circumferential spring assemblies). The flywheel has two
parts, joined by a damper, and it's possible to turn the transmission side
of the flywheel about 20 degrees or so with respect to the engine side.
hyundaitech said:Since I'm not that great at describing things, I did some googling on "dual
mass flywheel," and here's one of the better links I've found. It's the
LuK website.
http://www.luk.com/content.luk.de/en/products/clutch_systems_new/zms_new/zms_new.jsp
I do wish, however, everyone would stop using the verb "dampen" and the
noun "dampener" to indicate the verb "damp" and the noun "damper." Am I
alone in this?
Michael said:Matt,
I understand your point regarding items that wear and Hyundai having no idea
whether the item was abused or not. That doesn't work for me though. It is
too subjective, therefore there must be objective criteria for the service
person to use in order to judge whether abuse or misuse ocurred.
Thanks for the reply.
hyundaitech said:Since I'm not that great at describing things, I did some googling on "dual
mass flywheel," and here's one of the better links I've found. It's the
LuK website.
http://www.luk.com/content.luk.de/en/products/clutch_systems_new/zms_new/zms_new.jsp
I do wish, however, everyone would stop using the verb "dampen" and the
noun "dampener" to indicate the verb "damp" and the noun "damper." Am I
alone in this?