Wheels/Snow Tires

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by dkortz, Oct 22, 2006.

  1. Most would be better off slowing down a bit too. I don't have any
    statistics, but it seems as though many of the AWD and 4WD drivers think
    they can steer and stop in snow the same as they drive all the time. I've
    seen many of them by the side of the road. They don't comprehend the
    difference between traction to move through deep snow versus traction on
    slippery road. Slowing from 75 to 70 just doesn't do it., no matter what
    tires you have.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Oct 24, 2006
    #21
  2. Absolutely! They don't understand that the extra traction that allows
    them to accelerate to extra-legal speeds in snow means NOTHING when you
    have to corner or stop. Many of the truck-based 4WD systems are actually
    worse for cornering and stopping than FWD. Ignorant lemmings.
     
    Brian Nystrom, Oct 24, 2006
    #22
  3. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Luck has little to do with it. While 1/8" of tread is still legal in
    most states, it certainly isn't adequate in snow. And that has nothing
    to do with the type of tire. No tire will give decent snow traction
    with that little tread remaining.

    I run my tires down to 2/32" generally, but only if that occurs during
    the summer. I just replaced the tires on my minivan and they had a
    little more than 2/32" left, but it was getting too close to winter to
    risk running them longer.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 24, 2006
    #23
  4. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    It may for some folks, but I've driven in snow for 30+ years and it
    hasn't been a problem. The only accident I've had occurred just last
    December on a nice dry day ... I was hit by a drunk.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 24, 2006
    #24
  5. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Baloney. My truck will easily outrun either of my FWD minivan/cars in
    the yucky stuff and is much more stable at speed. Why do you think
    truck based 4WD systems are worse than FWD? Have you ever owned a 4WD
    truck?

    Matt


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 24, 2006
    #25
  6. What speed would that be? Surely, you don't think that any car is as stable
    at 70 mph with an inch of snow/slush on the road as it is when dry. That
    was my point. What was perfectly safe at 70+ is not very safe when the road
    is covered, but some people just don't slow down until they are out of
    control. Relatively speaking, you may be right, but not in absolute terms.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Oct 25, 2006
    #26
  7. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I believe the claim was that in messy conditions a FWD car is better
    than a 4WD truck. I don't believe that at all. I have two FWD vehicles
    and a 4WD pickup. I'll drive the pickup over the FWD cars any day on a
    snow covered or slushy road. The truck is heavier and less affected by
    slush. It also handles better in deep snow and is less prone to
    understeer and easier to recover from a skid should one occur. FWD cars
    are very tricky to handle in a skid as the response required is nearly
    opposite that for a RWD vehicle.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 25, 2006
    #27
  8. There are so many combinations of pickups and FWD vehicles that is just not
    possible to make a general statement that one is better than the other. .
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Oct 25, 2006
    #28
  9. Not really taking a side here, just an anecdote. My old pickup with
    part-time 4wd used to take technique to drive in the snow. Since there
    was no differential in the transfer case, the front and rear wheels
    were driven the same distance all the time. Any give between the two
    came from wheel slippage. Thus, it was bad to use on dry pavement.
    Also, on snow covered pavement, it was usually the front wheels that
    would slide in a turn. Not a terrible out of control thing, it was
    just that it really wanted to go straight instead of turning. It could
    shift on the fly, so I got fairly adept at using 4wd to get up to
    speed, and going back into rwd to make a corner, then getting back into
    4wd. With a stickshift truck it looked like a lot of work, but it
    worked well.

    I preferred the part time 4wd though, because I used to off-road a
    little, and at the time many full time systems with a differential in
    the middle didn't have a lock. You could have your front wheels on dry
    ground and your back wheels in mud, and your back wheels would spin
    with the front not doing much.

    Enjoy.
    Ben
     
    Richard Dreyfuss, Oct 25, 2006
    #29
  10. These are the types of systems I was referring to, though perhaps
    they're not what Matt and Edwin have. In addition to what Ben said,
    these systems also tend to increase stopping distance in slippery
    conditions.

    Let's also keep in mind that there are significant differences between
    "real" 4WD pickup trucks and truck-based SUVs. I would expect that the
    former would be good in snow, assuming they had enough weight in the
    back and the more aggressive tires that are typical. OTOH, when you try
    to "civilize" the platform for SUV use, you give up performance for comfort.
     
    Brian Nystrom, Oct 25, 2006
    #30
  11. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yes, that is true to a large degree, however, some generalizations can
    be made, particularly in slushy conditions. I've driven everything from
    VW Beetles (the original ones!) to tractor-trailers. A heavier vehicle
    is almost always better in slush than a lighter one. A tractor trailer
    can drive through 4" of slush and not even know it is on the road from a
    stability perspective. My pickup handles 2" with ease. My Beetles got
    skittish in 1/2" of slush.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 25, 2006
    #31
  12. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I have a part-time shift-on-the-fly system in my K1500. It steers fine
    in snow. The only time I notice the slippage front to rear is making a
    full lock turn at slow speed. Anything above 20 MPH it simply isn't
    even noticeable if the traction is poor enough to need to be in 4WD.

    Why do you think they increase stopping distance? Mine stops the same
    or even slightly shorter in 4WD. The reason is that the solid center
    differential and locking rear axle act like a poor man's ABS. It makes
    it hard to lock the wheels as you have to lock at least three of them.

    True, but even with the lesser performance, you are still ahead of FWD cars.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 25, 2006
    #32
  13. dkortz

    Mike Marlow Guest

    comfort.

    A little more explanation would be helpful Brian. A Blazer for example,
    uses the exact same type of power train as its "real" 4WD pickup relative
    does. Now, some of the import "SUV's" may be a different story - never
    really looked to see what they had for a power train.
     
    Mike Marlow, Oct 26, 2006
    #33
  14. I've read studies that indicated that they increase stopping distance
    and adversely affect handling compared to 2WD versions of the same vehicle.
     
    Brian Nystrom, Oct 26, 2006
    #34
  15. dkortz

    Mike Marlow Guest

    vehicle.

    I would bet that is due to the added weight of the 4WD.
     
    Mike Marlow, Oct 26, 2006
    #35
  16. dkortz

    ']['unez Guest

    Yup used to do alot of snowmobileing in Happy Valley. Im originally from
    Central Square, lived there for 23 years then moved down Rt 49 where 49
    comes into Rt 3, now I have given up on all the poopy weather and now live
    in Las Vegas, its nice not having to shovel all that white stuff but here we
    have to deal with above 100* summer days Oh Well such is life in the big
    city.

    ']['unez


     
    ']['unez, Oct 26, 2006
    #36
  17. That and also some effects from locked differentials.
     
    Brian Nystrom, Oct 26, 2006
    #37
  18. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Isn't the Blazer based on the S-10 pickup? That isn't a real pickup!
    :) That is a mini-pickup.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 26, 2006
    #38
  19. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Can you point me to one? I've never seen such a study or suggestion
    that this would be the case. It certainly doesn't correlate to my
    exerience and I can't think of a technical reason why it would be the case.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 26, 2006
    #39
  20. dkortz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    That is possible, however, extra weight generally also increases
    traction and largely offsets the inertial factor.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Oct 26, 2006
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.