transmission fluid power flush

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Dan, Feb 8, 2007.

  1. Dan

    Dan Guest

    05 hyundai elantra. 40000k's. Any thoughts on Valvoline's transmission
    power flush compared to say the Cottman method of draining the
    conventional way and changing the filter?
     
    Dan, Feb 8, 2007
    #1
  2. Dan

    Mike Marlow Guest

    You need to check your owner's manual and make sure that Valvoline can
    service the tranny with exactly the fluid specified in the manual - not a
    "compatible" or "equivalent" ATF. Last I knew, the aftermarket did not have
    a product that Hyundai approved, or that would work in a Hyundai tranny.
    Maybe that's changed by now, but you need to make 100% certain before
    accepting anything but Hyundai approved tranny fluid. It's not a marketing
    scam - there are real reasons for using the right product.
     
    Mike Marlow, Feb 9, 2007
    #2
  3. Dan

    Hyundaitech Guest

    You’ll replace more of the fluid with a flush. You don’t have a
    serviceable filter.

    If your fluid is in relatively good condition, a drain and fill is
    probably all that’s needed, but it won’t hurt to do a flush.

    Either way, make absolutely certain that only SPIII fluid is used
     
    Hyundaitech, Feb 9, 2007
    #3
  4. I would hardly ever take issue with you, Mr. Hyundaitech, especially
    considering who and what you are.

    I agree that no Dexron- or Mercon-based fluid (which is the VAST majority of
    fluid out there) should be used. I am also highly suspicious of
    multi-vehicle fluids for these vehicles, since most of them are also, at
    some point, Dexron-based.

    But my dealership, who has had a couple of issues of getting SPIII fluid,
    uses Chrysler's ATF+4. And they are insistent that, while the old (and
    still fairly common) ATF+3 was not compatible, ATF+4 is. And they have not
    reported one transmission issue since they started using ATF+4.

    I am getting ready to change my fluid soon, and bluntly, I am inclined to
    use ATF+4. Your comment would be helpful.

    Tom Wenndt
     
    Rev. Tom Wenndt, Feb 9, 2007
    #4
  5. Dan

    Dan Guest

    Is SPIII the same as ATF111? The latter is what they use at Midas.
     
    Dan, Feb 9, 2007
    #5
  6. The same? No, I'm quite sure of that. And if you are talking ATF (+) III,
    as I understand it, no that isn't compatible.

    But the new ATF+4 supposedly is, and my Hyundai/Kia dealer is using it in
    all of these types of transmissions.

    Tom Wenndt
     
    Rev. Tom Wenndt, Feb 10, 2007
    #6
  7. The same? No, I'm quite sure of that. And if you are talking ATF (+) III,
    as I understand it, no that isn't compatible.

    But the new ATF+4 supposedly is, and my Hyundai/Kia dealer is using it in
    all of these types of transmissions.

    Tom Wenndt
     
    Rev. Tom Wenndt, Feb 10, 2007
    #7
  8. Dan

    Hyundaitech Guest

    I don’t think either ATF+3 or ATF+4 are equivalent. Even the newest
    Mitsu products offered by DaimlerChrysler still require Diamond ATF,
    not ATF+3 or ATF+4 like the other products. Diamond ATF is equivalent
    to SPIII
     
    Hyundaitech, Feb 13, 2007
    #8
  9. Dan

    Finn Guest

    I do not understand why people do not go to the dealer and have it done
    right. Your talking about saving 20$ on something that could end up costing
    you 1000$ to replace.

    just my 0.02

    Finn
     
    Finn, Mar 1, 2007
    #9
  10. Dan

    Bob Guest

    Maybe because going to the dealer doesn't really gain you anything, and I
    suspect the price spread is more than $20. The dealer I bought both of my
    Sonatas from DOES NOT use SPIII. The use a "BG" magic universal fluid. Yes
    they are a Hyundai dealer.
     
    Bob, Mar 3, 2007
    #10
  11. Dan

    ryr604 Guest

    I work in the auto industry and transmission fluids are one of the
    most confusing lubricants/fluids for everyone but here is some
    information that may help you.

    Diamond SP III(Mitsubishi), Kia SP III, Hyundai SP III and Chrysler
    ATF +3 (Type 7176) are all the same fluid with different trade names.
    Kind of like drugs with different names but use the same ingredients
    (i.e. Tylenol, etc). It was originally developed for Chrysler but if
    you want to call the fluid ATF +3 you would have to pay Chrysler a
    licensing fee, hence the different trade names but because of certain
    laws for the auto industry Chrysler must allow other companies to make
    their own versions.

    Another example is Dexron III (GM) and Mercon I (FORD). These are
    both different trade names for the same fluid.

    For warranty purposes you can use any fluid as long as it has passed
    certification but I would only use fluids from a reputable company
    that will guarantee its products. The dealer/manufacturer actually
    has to prove that transmission failure or damage was caused by fluid
    failure or whatever. They cannot tell you that you must use their
    fluid! This is illegal according to the Moss-Magnuson Act for
    automobile aftermarket repairs. But it is your responsibility that
    you do use a fluid that does meet warranty requirements.

    As for ATF +4 this is essentially an upgrade from ATF +3 that Chrysler
    had developed for their newer transmissions. According to Chrysler
    ATF +4 is backwards compatible with ATF +3 and they actually recommend
    using ATF +4 for all applications that used to recommend ATF +3.

    Hope this helps
     
    ryr604, Mar 7, 2007
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.