Tire Pressure

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Edgar MacArthur, Apr 19, 2007.

  1. A contributor on another forum is advocating running the 18-in.
    Bridgestone tires on the 07 Santa Fe at 38-40 psi., rather than the 30
    psi recommended by Hyundai. He suggests this gives a better and safer
    ride. The max. on the sidewall is 44 lbs. Do any of our experts have any
    thoughts on this?
     
    Edgar MacArthur, Apr 19, 2007
    #1
  2. Edgar MacArthur

    hyundaitech Guest

    It all depends on what you're looking for. The Santa Fe is heavy enough
    that 30 is probably not enough for even tire wear. But I'd surmise that
    38-40 will wear out the centers. My suggestion would be about 35 PSI for
    optimal tire wear.
     
    hyundaitech, Apr 19, 2007
    #2
  3. Edgar MacArthur

    Eric G. Guest

    Can't really speak to the Sante Fe, but on my 2007 Entourage, the door
    sticker says 32 PSI. The sidewall, like yours, says 44 PSI MAX COLD. I
    have tried everything between the two numbers and 38 PSI seems to be the
    winner for me. Above that and I get a bit of a harsh ride. Below that and
    the turn-in isn't quite as crisp. I also seem to get a hair better gas
    mileage at 38 PSI, but I don't really have enough data yet to support that
    as a conclusion.

    Eric
     
    Eric G., Apr 20, 2007
    #3
  4. Edgar MacArthur

    B Crawford Guest

    I ran my old Isuzu Rodeo with more tire pressure in the range you're
    talking. I got fairly even tire wear but damn if I didn't burn out the rear
    wheel bearings. Related ?, well maybe from the extra uncushioned pounding
    over the years?
    Another consideration anyway.
    BCinBC
     
    B Crawford, Apr 20, 2007
    #4
  5. I have noticed that Hyundai likes that 30 psi number - don't know why. It
    is also the recommended pressure for the Elantra.

    With my Elantra, I thought that, at 30, the tires rode too soft and wallowy.
    My "ultimate" pressure seems to be between 34 and 35.

    I would agree that somewhere between 34 and 36 would be optimum. Also agree
    with HyundaiTech that I might try 35 first, and check your ride, etc.
    Conceivably, you could try 100 miles or so at 34, another 100 at 38 and so
    forth, just to see how they ride. But in terms of wear, you would need many
    more miles than that.

    I must caution you regarding even slight "over-inflation" of tires. While
    it is a small risk, higher center of gravity vehicles (like SUV's like the
    Santa Fe) are more prone to rollovers at higher air pressures. Ford, in
    taking that problem to the extreme with their troublesome Explorer, actually
    recommended 26 psi specifically to reduce the rollover rate. They also
    specified a Firestone Wilderness tire that, at the time, only had a
    government temperature rating of 'C' (current Wilderness's have the more
    common 'B'). The results were disastrous and well known.

    Again, a very small risk but something to keep in mind.

    Tom Wenndt
     
    Rev. Tom Wenndt, Apr 20, 2007
    #5
  6. Edgar MacArthur

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Tom,

    What is the source of your information here? This is exactly opposite
    my understanding. The extra distortion of tires at low pressure more
    than offsets the slight additional CG height in an abrupt maneuver.

    http://mb-soft.com/public/rollover.html


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Apr 20, 2007
    #6
  7. In theory, what you say is true, and I don't dispute that - and as your
    source points out, in most cases, that is the case.

    But it would take me way too long to get you to the best source for the
    Firestone Wilderness/Ford Explorer debacle. There is a ton of information
    out there from that.

    But Ford had to readily admit that the rollover worry (which was really more
    of a design flaw in the Explorer more than anything else) was the reason
    they specified 26 psi.

    After the spotlight got turned on the matter, Ford changed their specs on
    the Explorer to 30, which in my book is still a tad low for a heavy SUV.
    But they clearly were worried about rollovers.

    Of course, the less air in the tire, the more there will be a problem. My
    suspicion is that the reason the Firestone/Explorer thing was SO bad was
    that, in most cases, the tires that were blowing out probably didn't have
    anywhere near 26 psi in them. Until this happened, way too many people
    didn't check their air pressures regularly. With slow leakage and such, I
    am betting that many of these tires didn't have over 20 psi in them. At and
    around that pressure, your source here is right on the money.

    Thanx for writing.
     
    Rev. Tom Wenndt, Apr 20, 2007
    #7
  8. Edgar MacArthur

    hyundaitech Guest

    If memory serves, it was pretty well publicized in the Ford Explorer issue
    that Ford's empirical data showed that 26PSI made the vehicle less prone
    to roll over, and that's why they recommended that pressure.

    If memory serves further, the reason for the rollovers was because of the
    tread separation of the tires, causing a significant loss of pressure or a
    blowout, leading to loss of control of the vehicle. As I recall, there was
    significant evidence that the reason for tread separation was due to the
    overheating of the tires, which can be at least partially traced back to
    the horrendously low 26 PSI recommendation.
     
    hyundaitech, Apr 20, 2007
    #8
  9. Edgar MacArthur

    Matt Whiting Guest

    OK, you made a claim with no data to support it. I understand.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Apr 21, 2007
    #9
  10. Edgar MacArthur

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I searched around and found no such claim by Ford. I saw claims that
    the lower pressure allowed the tires to hold the road better and reduced
    some vibrations in the tire/suspension combination, but I saw no claim
    from Ford about lower tire pressure reducing the roll-over potential,
    and I believe that physics suggests this simply isn't the case.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Apr 21, 2007
    #10
  11. A contributor on another forum is advocating running the 18-in.
    I run my Yokohama H4s on my 02 Sonata at around 32-34 cold and they
    perform the best. They're rated to 40psi max so I am well under spec
    and have experienced fairly even wear. You ought to stick around 34-37
    depending on your driving habits because even though your tires might
    be rated up to a max of 44psi, you do experience uneven wear as you
    move up to the max spec numbers. You'll have to find a psi sweet spot.
    The next time you go for tire rotations, ask the techs to give you
    depth reading from the sidewalls to the center and this will give you
    an indication if your wear is even or not. Of course, it also depends
    on the tires too. Some have slightly softer centers, some not. They're
    all made different. good luck.

    - Thee Chicago Wolf
     
    Thee Chicago Wolf, Apr 21, 2007
    #11
  12. Edgar MacArthur

    pmkeating Guest

    A lot of work goes into qualifying a tire for a vehicle manufacturer.
    The placard pressure is given as the best optimum pressure for a wide
    variety of tire characteristics.

    Higher pressure will generally NOT give a smoother ride - in fact the
    opposite is true. Higher pressure will decrease the amount of contact
    area between the tire and the road which will reduce traction on sry
    surfaces. Going from 30 to 40 PSI is a huge jump and will likely
    increase irregular wear and possibly noise.

    The pressure on the sidewall should be ignored. That number comes
    from a tire standardizing body and is unrelated to the specific
    vehicle/application.
     
    pmkeating, Apr 23, 2007
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.