Sonata Side Bags Allegedly Didn't Protect Enough of Torso

Discussion in 'Hyundai Sonata' started by Robert Cohen, Apr 19, 2004.

  1. Robert Cohen

    Robert Cohen Guest

    FRONTLINE, the often worthwhile NBC documentary tv program,

    last night ran a piece on national insurance companies' testing of the impacts
    of side collisions/crunches on various (mid-size?) makes/models

    supposedly the hyundai sonata's side air bag protected the crash dummy's head,
    but didn't do as well as one would hope in protecting its torso

    the collision experiments were at something like 31 mph with a fake suv/truck

    my humble reaction/comment:

    well, damn shit, harsh reality as usual--on these kinds of testing matters, i
    trust the insurance companies, because who would know better?

    what can i do?

    10. give up, because life sucks anyway
    9. write a constructive note to hyundai, because they saw the same study
    8. never leave the house, except for own funeral, after dying from chronic
    boredom
    7. think that the marketplace, such as it is, is full of such glitches, ugly
    tricks & a zillion fucking flaws; and it just can't get better according to k
    marx
    6. vote for nader, and lose-lose some more
    5. don't endorse a car in a newsgroup or anywhere else
    4. think that 31 mph is not really as fast as a car could smash my torso
    3. not believe in the validity of the study--seek flaws--be in denial
    2. think about adding some kind of extra cushioning to the sides of my little
    cars, which i have been thinking about for a half-dozen years now
    1. two words: nurf bar (nerf bar for cars)
    0. apply ugly non-aero-dynamic water-bags
    -1. huge plastic sheet bubble-cushionings car jacket
    -2. don't worry/be happy
    5.
     
    Robert Cohen, Apr 19, 2004
    #1
  2. Robert Cohen

    hyundaitech Guest

    I'm going with option -2. I didn't see the report, so I can't compare with
    other vehicles, but these are the things that spring quickly to mind:

    1. 31 mph is actually rather fast for a collision
    2. There is a significant weight and size disadvantage for the car.
    3. A side impact is at pretty much point blank range (about 4-6 inches)
    4. Exactly how much protection did you think you would get in such a
    collision?

    This test seems designed to put the car at a significant disadvantage. It
    strikes me that the Insurance industry may have purposely constructed this
    test in an effort to make vehicles perform poorly. If they want
    improvements in passenger safety, this is one way to achieve it.
     
    hyundaitech, Apr 21, 2004
    #2
  3. Robert Cohen

    Old_Timer Guest

    The impression I got from this report is that some cars with side air
    bags give better protection higher up the body than others. The
    design of the Hyundai side air bag does not provide protection as high
    up as some others that I beleive are referred to as Side Curtain Air
    Bags..

    Old_Timer
     
    Old_Timer, Apr 21, 2004
    #3
  4. Robert Cohen

    Neil Guest

    Conspiracy theorists might say it was a joint effort between OPEC and the
    Big Three to get us to buy more SUVs, and consequently more fuel.

    It would be interesting to see 2 SUVs come together in a side-impact test.
     
    Neil, Apr 21, 2004
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.