Headlights going out

- That is great, but you haven't presented a case. Was it somewhere in
between calling everyone that disagreed with you an idiot and making
stuff up about people? Oh yeah, it was the case for seeing cars a long
way away, just remembered, LOL .

- Well, you simply do argue and it seems to be all you are capable of
doing. You certainly are not gifted with honest discussion and can't
seem to take the time to pin down any true rational to your comments.

You are a curiosity that I found interesting for a brief period, you
have presented an adequate case study of what happens when people type
before they think .

Have a good one and God bless,

Larry

 

Sorry to disappoint you Larry, but I'm not "riled up" as you hoped, nor
do I have any particular concern about DRLs. What I do care about is
that the information here is accurate or at least that both sides of an
issue get presented, so that others reading it can make informed
decisions. If you want to continue to post your bizarre opinions on this
subject as fact, I'll continue to point out your errors. Your
closed-mindedness is evident and your silly diversionary ploys don't
work. If you expect people to feel sorry for you or to accept your
opinions simply because you keep repeating them, you have a few things
to learn about Usenet.

 

And the silliness continues...<yawn>

You still haven't figured out that you're a lone voice crying in the
wind, have you?

Larry, all you've done is present your OPINIONS, which are not supported
by the research on the subject. Claiming something is true doesn't make
it so, no matter how many times you do it.

 

- Sounds like the one who needs to learn about Usenet, is you. The way
that you presented your argument has failed, just admit it and go on.

The proof of you being affected by this subject is very obvious. The
evidence is the lack of clear reasoning in your discussions and the
distinct lack of facts, as well. You post fast and fail to make sense,
this is because this subject affects you. If you were just simply
having a discussion, you would not have carried out such a tirade.

You are for DRLs, wonderful, but you haven't made one distinctive point
that even supports them. You are grasping at straws and I don't know
why you even bother responding.

Look, I don't want to know what your issues are, but your response to
me shows that you have something going on that causes you to continue
this.

I really wish that I could help you, but apparently you are beyond
assistance.

God bless,

Larry

 

Brian Nystrom wrote:

- No, I presented actual links and actual observances of more than just
my own. Go back and open your eyes to what I have posted. Yes, I did
present my opinions, as well, duh.

See if you can show that you presented nothing more than your opinions,
I don't remember you actually proving any facts in defense of your
assertion that people need their lights on in broad daylight. What is
next, you will be supporting Daylight Running Horns to alert people to
your presence, oh yes I am sure that you could "make a case" for that,
as well.

Look, you have your opinions, I have mine. I have shown that we went
for many many years without DRLs and would do just fine without them.
But you seem to think that we need to see cars in the next county, LOL,
you can't be serious.

I have the history of use of lights during the day, the fact that many
states had it as illegal before NHSTA allowed it, the fact that the
majority of manufacturers see no reason to have them, that there is no
direct evidence of DRLs being an actual safety feature and that there
are studies that indicate that DRLs are actually detrimental to safety.
I have offered up reasoned opinions on masking and the focus of
distraction of the lights.

You, however only talk about long distance usage to see a car far off
and that in your opinion anyone that disagrees with your opinions is an
idiot. In your defense, I think that you might have referenced one
fact?? Anyway, you need to learn how to debate.

I am still laughing at you and enjoying the fact that you continue to
respond. It is as if you just can't help yourself.

I wonder if you could care less about this subject, but go around
picking fights, hmmm.

Cheers,

Larry

 

ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

 

Larry, I don't need your help, but perhaps you should seek out
professional counsel. You have ignored everything others have presented
here and blindly stuck to your opinion, despite the evidence against it.
You are in complete denial of the truth, for some strange reason. I
tired of arguing with some who acts like an obstinate child. Everyone
here can see what you're doing and no one is supporting you or your
position. You're wrong. Get over it. Move on.

 

So finally you reveal your true character and intentions. You're just
another pathetic troll. Shame on me for not realizing that sooner.

 

- You are still being affected by this subject, why? I still don't
know, LOL.

It would have been nice if you did have some evidence or a line of
reasoning, still haven't seen that.

Now, buzz off and go play with your friends, ROTFLOL.

Cheers,

Larry

 

- By the way, there are not any Trolls on Usenet, I figured you would
have known that. Especially since there is not any membership
requirements, hmmm.

Yes, I laugh at you. I laugh at anyone who calls people names and
spouts off with no facts. You keep doing it over and over.

The point of your continued posting is what?

,

Larry