Another thought about car radios

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Richard Steinfeld, Mar 4, 2005.

  1. We were talking about Hyundai radios.

    In the field of home stereo, which I'm familiar with, the
    performance of AM radio circuits has been terrible. The FM is
    usually good-to-excellent; the AM quality is similar to that of a
    cheap table radio. AM radio transmission engineers sometimes take
    pride in putting out a signal that's as good as it's possible to
    transmit, and that can be surprisingly decent. Of course, AM is
    subject to interference. But AM can travel long distances. We've
    had two classical music stations on-and-off in the Bay Area
    transmitting on AM, and they've been tolerable; classical music
    is far and away the most demanding test of any audio system --
    rock music isn't even in the ballpark.

    Old car radios delivered excellent performance on AM. They had
    outstanding circuits. If you don't believe me, sit in the seat of
    an antique collector car with a restored original radio and be
    amazed. However, in recent years, the AM performance of car
    radios has declined to the point where it's not much better than
    home stereo quality. And I'd not be surprised to find that the AM
    performance of a rotgut $20 all-in-one car stereo from the auto
    parts chain is no worse than a $500 name-brand receiver --
    they're probably both using the same AM radio chip. The
    manufacturers just don't take AM seriously (and, hell, with
    everything sounding like Rush Limbaugh, why should they?).

    In short, changing from an awful window antenna to a vertical
    whip will vastly improve reception on AM, but it won't deliver
    decent music quality from a typical car stereo.

    Richard
     
    Richard Steinfeld, Mar 4, 2005
    #1
  2. Richard Steinfeld

    who Guest

    Hi again Richard. I recently found a 2 tube superegenerative radio project
    I built when in junior high school. Fifty three years ago as a matter of
    fact. Parked here at my house was the XG350 so having an inquisitive mind.
    I fired the old "beast" up and tuned it to a local AM station. The signal
    was better on the 53 year old homebrew radio than the XG350 piece of Doo
    Doo that came with the car. The old antiquity had a ferrite loop for an
    antenna . Sometimes a trip to yesteryear yields "surprises".

    I also understand the broadcast mental attitude on Rush Limpballs lol
     
    who, Mar 14, 2005
    #2
  3. | Hi again Richard. I recently found a 2 tube superegenerative
    radio project
    | I built when in junior high school. Fifty three years ago as a
    matter of
    | fact. Parked here at my house was the XG350 so having an
    inquisitive mind.
    | I fired the old "beast" up and tuned it to a local AM station.
    The signal
    | was better on the 53 year old homebrew radio than the XG350
    piece of Doo
    | Doo that came with the car. The old antiquity had a ferrite
    loop for an
    | antenna . Sometimes a trip to yesteryear yields "surprises".
    |
    | I also understand the broadcast mental attitude on Rush
    Limpballs lol
    |

    Ha ha.
    Well, the question for me regarding car audio is not "how great
    is it?" but "Is it adequate?
    Audiophile quality in a noisy car is absurd. People are dumping
    all this money into it. What a scam.

    The OEM radio in my 2000 Sonata, the one that turns itself on
    when I hit bumps, is a top-end model, the H935. Like every car
    stereo with CD, it's designed to damage the compact disks. I'm
    getting more un-fond of it the more I learn the thing. It's got a
    vertical CD changer -- the kind that I'm certain will
    self-destruct. And the tape section that I really want has no
    Dolby (all commercial music cassettes were recorded with Dolby
    encoding); Dolby tapes played back without Dolby sound ratty. So,
    let's see: the CD stinks and the tape stinks. And this stereo's
    damn tall in order to accomodate the CD changer that's unwanted
    and will break. I think it's called a "double DIN" profile.

    I'm toying with the idea of ripping it out and replacing it with
    a "Lear Jet" normal DIN stereo that I'd bought from JC Whitney 15
    years ago (I lucked out, but you might not). This one has Dolby
    and a 5-band EQ. When I called Lear Jet, they were incredulous
    that someone ripped off their trademark: "We haven't made car
    audio for over twelve years. Where did you say that you bought
    the thing?" To muddy the waters further, it was made in Korea and
    imported into the US via Canada. I've often wondered if the
    buyers at JC Whitney even look at products before putting them in
    their catalog. (Good story, huh?)

    What I'm not clear about is whether it would be possible to
    install the older car stereo into the Sonata's dashboard neatly
    or not.

    Richard
     
    Richard Steinfeld, Mar 15, 2005
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.