2005 Santa Fe Accelerator

Discussion in 'Hyundai Santa Fe' started by WuzYoungOnceToo, Feb 17, 2006.

  1. I don't think it'll significantly affect your fuel mileage...

    Since I'm doing primarily highway driving you're probably right. If I
    were mostly a city driver I'd disagree.
     
    WuzYoungOnceToo, Feb 22, 2006
    #41
  2. WuzYoungOnceToo

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yes, even though my degrees are in CS and EE, even I don't think that
    EVERYTHING has to be controlled with electronics and software! It is
    like the headlights on my 03 Dodge minivan. They are controlled via the
    BCM rather than directly switched like my 96 Plymouth minivan. There is
    a noticeable delay between flipping the switch and having the lights
    change from low to high and back. I'm not really sure that having the
    computer dim the headlights is really progress, especially when there is
    a detectable delay. They either should use a faster processor or go
    back to a relay.

    I assume the Sonata is controlled by computer also, but I haven't
    noticed any significant delay in the dimmer switch, unlike the throttle
    which has a noticeable delay and then too much gain once it begins to
    move. It also seems to be rate sensitive. It feels, to me anyway, that
    the faster I move the throttle the faster it responds, but not linearly
    with speed as one would expect. It seems that moving the throttle twice
    as fast gets 3-4 times the rate of RPM increase.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Feb 22, 2006
    #42
  3. WuzYoungOnceToo

    Matt Whiting Guest

    But even cars with cable actuated throttles can do this as the throttle
    only controls the butterfly (air flow), the computer still controls the
    fuel injection.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Feb 22, 2006
    #43
  4. Presumably, the lower compression results in better durability.

    That may well be true (at least theoretically), but with gasoline at
    $2+/gal (and almost certain to at LEAST double over the next decade)
    it's going to take an awful lot of increased durability to even come
    close to offseting that extra cost due to decreased fuel
    efficiency...especially considering how long most engines go now days
    without any significant maintenance anyway. Add in the fact that my
    new powertrain is warranteed for 10 years and I fail to see the benefit
    of sacrificing mileage (especially when the vehicle is newer, smaller
    and ligher) for some potential reduction in engine cylinder wear.
     
    WuzYoungOnceToo, Feb 22, 2006
    #44
  5. WuzYoungOnceToo

    swenstrup Guest

     
    swenstrup, Feb 27, 2006
    #45
  6. WuzYoungOnceToo

    swenstrup Guest

    Have Hyundai or their dealerships recognized this acceleration problem?


    ve by the pedel.
     
    swenstrup, Feb 27, 2006
    #46
  7. Update: After my 2nd tank of fuel my mileage has improved to 17.3 mpg.
    Nowhere near where it should be yet, but a positive trend anyway.
     
    WuzYoungOnceToo, Feb 27, 2006
    #47
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.